What term describes the discussion of the merits of a motion in FBLA meetings?

The term that best describes the discussion of the merits of a motion in FBLA meetings is "debate." In the context of meetings and parliamentary procedure, debate refers to the formal discussion of a motion where members express their support or opposition, present arguments, and consider the implications of the motion at hand. During this time, members may present their viewpoints, ask questions, and provide counterarguments, allowing for a thorough examination of the issue before a vote is taken.

This distinction is important because a debate is structured and often follows specific rules that guide the discussion, ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to voice their opinions, which is essential for making informed decisions in an organization like FBLA. Other terms, such as "forum" or "discussion," do not capture the formal and rule-bound nature of a debate. "Adjudication," on the other hand, typically refers to a judicial process rather than the collaborative and democratic discourse that occurs in a meeting setting. This is why "debate" is the most suitable term for the situation described.